Saturday, 21 November 2009
KHOODEELAAR! Telling the BBC Radio 4 NEWSQUIZ programme to get the true facts about the Railways on
KHOODEELAAR! Telling the BBC Radio 4 NEWSQUIZ programme to get the true facts about the Railways on
Thursday, 12 November 2009
KHOODEELAAR! Contextual updater on the BBC Politics Show London report of KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail
0500 [0450] Hrs GMT London Friday 13 November 2009:
By © Muhammad Haque.
Why did the BBC Politics Show carry that report?
The simple answer is that that week in March 2006 was one of several defining moments in the past [almost] 6 years of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in defence of the East End of London.
Two practical factors were at play: One the Khoodeelaar! Campaign had just announced final arrangements to actually file High Court action against the then UK Transport Minister Alistair Darling [who would have been sued on 27 March 2006]. Two the 2006 ‘local council elections’ were just over 5 weeks away.
The contextual importance of that time was also linked with and followed from the international publicity the Khoodeelaar! Campaign had achieved in the previous two months.
People in the UK were aware of the Khoodeelaar! Defence of the community in the East End of London as against the powers and the resources of Big Business and of their stooged UK government bureaucracy.
The Khoodeelaar! Intervention in the ‘local council election campaign’ was conducted in such a way that the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole-inviting Council read – MISTAKENLY – that Khoodeelaar! was about to take part in the election by FIELDING candidates of its own and thus threatening the petty careers of any number of cliquester-councillors on Tower Hopeless Council. That misreading by the clique was not their only serious mistake. They misunderstood the Khoodeelaar! Campaign and sought to treat it as ‘another campaign’.
By that they meant that Khoodeelaar! was a campaign [any other campaign that the corrupt Councill had been used to...] to make petty or any sort of career for its organisers. So the Crossrail hole-inviting Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique tried to stage a coup, trying to bribe certain members of the community. They failed…The Khoodeelaar! Campaign collected organisational and ethical reinforcements and on that basis mounted the constitutional law legal challenge intending to bring out Alistair Darling and force him to answer charges in a Court of law.
One already long standing question that Khoodeelaar! would have asked Alistair Darling to answer in court was to do with his assertion on record [Hansard 22 February 2005] that the contents of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ that he formally tabled in the UK House of Commons on that date [22 February 2005] were ‘compatible’ with the [European Human Rights] Conventions.
The other key question which Khoodeelaar! had asked, typically exclusively as the evidence shows on the ‘Crossrail hole agenda scam as packaged and passaged through the UK Houses of Parliament’, was to do with Alistair Darling’s mis-use of his powers as the cabinet minister in the UK Govt. in making available £100 Million of UK public money to the Transport for London and the then contrivance CLRL under Section 6 of the particularly corruptly passaged ADDITIONAL legislation the ‘Railways Act 2005’ .[To be continued]
By © Muhammad Haque.
Why did the BBC Politics Show carry that report?
The simple answer is that that week in March 2006 was one of several defining moments in the past [almost] 6 years of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in defence of the East End of London.
Two practical factors were at play: One the Khoodeelaar! Campaign had just announced final arrangements to actually file High Court action against the then UK Transport Minister Alistair Darling [who would have been sued on 27 March 2006]. Two the 2006 ‘local council elections’ were just over 5 weeks away.
The contextual importance of that time was also linked with and followed from the international publicity the Khoodeelaar! Campaign had achieved in the previous two months.
People in the UK were aware of the Khoodeelaar! Defence of the community in the East End of London as against the powers and the resources of Big Business and of their stooged UK government bureaucracy.
The Khoodeelaar! Intervention in the ‘local council election campaign’ was conducted in such a way that the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole-inviting Council read – MISTAKENLY – that Khoodeelaar! was about to take part in the election by FIELDING candidates of its own and thus threatening the petty careers of any number of cliquester-councillors on Tower Hopeless Council. That misreading by the clique was not their only serious mistake. They misunderstood the Khoodeelaar! Campaign and sought to treat it as ‘another campaign’.
By that they meant that Khoodeelaar! was a campaign [any other campaign that the corrupt Councill had been used to...] to make petty or any sort of career for its organisers. So the Crossrail hole-inviting Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique tried to stage a coup, trying to bribe certain members of the community. They failed…The Khoodeelaar! Campaign collected organisational and ethical reinforcements and on that basis mounted the constitutional law legal challenge intending to bring out Alistair Darling and force him to answer charges in a Court of law.
One already long standing question that Khoodeelaar! would have asked Alistair Darling to answer in court was to do with his assertion on record [Hansard 22 February 2005] that the contents of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ that he formally tabled in the UK House of Commons on that date [22 February 2005] were ‘compatible’ with the [European Human Rights] Conventions.
The other key question which Khoodeelaar! had asked, typically exclusively as the evidence shows on the ‘Crossrail hole agenda scam as packaged and passaged through the UK Houses of Parliament’, was to do with Alistair Darling’s mis-use of his powers as the cabinet minister in the UK Govt. in making available £100 Million of UK public money to the Transport for London and the then contrivance CLRL under Section 6 of the particularly corruptly passaged ADDITIONAL legislation the ‘Railways Act 2005’ .[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! Contextual update [2] on 'proceedings in Parliament' about Crossrail as linked to Vince Cable's co-league Norman Baker..[2]
1000 GMT
London
Thursday
12 November 2009
Editor © Muhammad Haque
Khoodeelaar! Told you so! There is cross talk about Crossrail across the cross-bent House of Commons featuring in the plastic replay of the acts rehearsed and staged on so many previous occasions at the behest of the real pullers of the strings. Now even Norman Baker, whose questions [‘written answer’ dated 15 October 2009] we reported yesterday, is 'thinking the unthinkable’ [!!!!]. The scenario of a CANCELLED Crossrail… And in effect reviving what Vince Cable had said in September...that Crossrail was NOT a priority for the UK Lib Dems if they were sited anywhere near the configuration of 'power' in a post election regime in Britain. The ‘spin’ put behind the Norman Baker floatation of ‘fears’ about the COST OF CANCELLING Crossrail is typical of the ‘New Civil Engineer’ and assorted other construction trade organs. They have now reached the point of admitting that Crossrail is a wasteful diversion in the economy but they can’t get the message. They are still in denial, as Norman Baker seems to have become. For Norman Baker, the experience must be quite something. Given that he has set himself up as a sort of inquisitive MP keen to hold the executive to [at least] some account, Norman Baker’s peddling role for the CRASSrail agenda pushers does not fit his recent profile… That the CRASSrail peddlers have managed to get Norman Baker to spiel on their behalf shows just how influential the forces are in the UK House of Stooges…[To be continued]
Posted by AADHIKARonline London UK at 2:07 AM 0 comments
London
Thursday
12 November 2009
Editor © Muhammad Haque
Khoodeelaar! Told you so! There is cross talk about Crossrail across the cross-bent House of Commons featuring in the plastic replay of the acts rehearsed and staged on so many previous occasions at the behest of the real pullers of the strings. Now even Norman Baker, whose questions [‘written answer’ dated 15 October 2009] we reported yesterday, is 'thinking the unthinkable’ [!!!!]. The scenario of a CANCELLED Crossrail… And in effect reviving what Vince Cable had said in September...that Crossrail was NOT a priority for the UK Lib Dems if they were sited anywhere near the configuration of 'power' in a post election regime in Britain. The ‘spin’ put behind the Norman Baker floatation of ‘fears’ about the COST OF CANCELLING Crossrail is typical of the ‘New Civil Engineer’ and assorted other construction trade organs. They have now reached the point of admitting that Crossrail is a wasteful diversion in the economy but they can’t get the message. They are still in denial, as Norman Baker seems to have become. For Norman Baker, the experience must be quite something. Given that he has set himself up as a sort of inquisitive MP keen to hold the executive to [at least] some account, Norman Baker’s peddling role for the CRASSrail agenda pushers does not fit his recent profile… That the CRASSrail peddlers have managed to get Norman Baker to spiel on their behalf shows just how influential the forces are in the UK House of Stooges…[To be continued]
Posted by AADHIKARonline London UK at 2:07 AM 0 comments
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
